-
WillBet deposit methods
Treasures of Kongar från Play’n GO
Florida Gators vs. Auburn Tigers Odds, Player Prop Picks & Prediction
How to Claim over $2500 in Betting Bonuses for the 2025 MLB Season
How to Claim over $2500 in Betting Bonuses for the 2025 MLB Season
-
willbet Sportsbook
Om Infinite Bet Stacker Blackjack
Glitnor & Roar Vegas får sammanlagt betala över 30 miljoner kr i böter
Star Entertainment in crisis as refinancing deal falls apart
Croatia gambling industry warns RG reforms may have negative impact
BetMGM Sportsbook Bonus: Up to $50K with March Matchups Pick'Em (Apr. 4
-
willbet Confectionery
Årets mest misslyckade spelsläpp
ICE Barcelona 2025 & iGB from CasinoWow's point of view
Attempt to stop ADW greyhound racing bets fails in North Dakota
How to Claim over $2500 in Betting Bonuses for the 2025 MLB Season
-
WillBet casino online swish
Allt om Klubbpotten på nya casinot Spelklubben
Vinn upp till 101 830x i ny spion
MLB Over/Under Bet: Boston Red Sox vs. Baltimore Orioles, April 2
location:Willbet.com Play Online Casino Games in EURO and Win Real money > Willbet Slots casino > 【Pirate Bonanza provider】-Major US sportsbooks hit with lawsuit in Washington DC
-
Willbet Slots casino
Twitter
Heart
Facebook
Tipico to stop marketing suppliers working with black
The five US sportsbooks operating in Washington DC have been hit with a lawsuit that challenges their legal basis.
The suit, filed by a specially formed entity called DC Gambling Recovery LLC, argues the district’s Sports Wagering Lottery Amendment Act which legalised sports betting was constitutionally unsound.
Five US operators have launched in DC since Intralot’s sports betting monopoly fell apart last year, including FanDuel, DraftKings, BetMGM, Ceasars and Fanatics.
While the complaint was initially filed in DC Superior Court at the end of February, it has since been removed to the US District Court for the District of Colombia.
US civil defendants often attempt to move cases to federal court where plaintiffs in practice face harder barriers to success.
The complaint argued that Murphy v. NCAA, the 2018 Supreme Court case that overturned PASPA and opened the door to US sports betting, should not apply in DC, because it was ruled on Tenth Amendment grounds.
This part of the US Constitution says any powers not reserved for the federal government should be delegated to the states, which the US capital city does not qualify as.
The attorneys wrote: “The District apparently thought that the Supreme Court’s New Jersey decision meant that PASPA no longer applied to it.
“But that is wrong: the Tenth Amendment does not apply to the District of Columbia, so PASPA’s prohibition remains in full force in the District. The SWLAA is thus without any legal force or effect.”
DC firm highlights Stuart-era law in filing
The lawyers, employed by boutique law firm Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, also highlighted the 1710 Statute of Anne remains in effect in the district.
This is the law that makes gambling debts under $25 unenforceable and allows for others to sue on the loser’s behalf if no claim is brought within three months.
As such, DC Lottery Recovery LLC is suing the sportsbooks for all customer losses over $25 and treble in damages.
The complaint stated: “Between brick-and-mortar books (like Caesars Sportsbook) and their digital equivalents, DC gamblers now wager (and lose) tens of millions of dollars each month on sports gambling.
“And that number is rising quickly, reflecting an unprecedented public health crisis of gambling-related addiction, especially among some of the DC-area’s youngest and most vulnerable residents.”
The lawsuit is just the latest twist in the tumultuous story of DC’s sports betting market, which in April 2024 was opened up to the major commercial betting operators following the fallout of the perceived failure of the previous monopoly, run by Greek lottery supplier Intralot.
Many of the details regarding Intralot’s contract with the city are controversial, and the business was fined $5m in January by the DC Council for breaching its provisions.